Author Topic: Improving the CPCs sound capabilities.  (Read 214 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Bryce

  • The Hardware Guy.
  • Supporter
  • 6128 Plus
  • *
  • Posts: 9.743
  • Country: wf
  • It's not broken, it just hasn't been fixed yet.
    • index.php?action=treasury
  • Liked: 2995
Improving the CPCs sound capabilities.
« on: Yesterday at 10:56 »
Hi all,
     I've been watching this project: http://www.avray.ru/  for a while and it seems to have matured far enough to be a realistic AY replacement. I've been wondering if it would be interesting to take it further and give the AY new capabilities beyond what the original could do, but still stay 100% compatible. What do the Chiptuners among us think? Would there be any value in having an AY 2.0 with new features?

Bryce.

Offline Targhan

  • Supporter
  • 464 Plus
  • *
  • Posts: 418
  • Country: fr
  • Liked: 331
Re: Improving the CPCs sound capabilities.
« Reply #1 on: Yesterday at 11:19 »
Personally, I wouldn't want to use anything else than the original AY from the CPC. Plus you would need a software to compose your song on it, plus you would need people to have their hardware changed... A lot of work for something that it not "CPC" anymore.

Offline Bryce

  • The Hardware Guy.
  • Supporter
  • 6128 Plus
  • *
  • Posts: 9.743
  • Country: wf
  • It's not broken, it just hasn't been fixed yet.
    • index.php?action=treasury
  • Liked: 2995
Re: Improving the CPCs sound capabilities.
« Reply #2 on: Yesterday at 12:04 »
Yes, unfortunately the AY is soldered in the CPC :(

Bryce.

Offline Sykobee (Briggsy)

  • 6128 Plus
  • ******
  • Posts: 605
  • Country: gb
  • Liked: 187
Re: Improving the CPCs sound capabilities.
« Reply #3 on: Yesterday at 12:52 »
I think many would like more channels without using up more I/O ports.
And maybe some different waveforms? And modulations?
And more levels of amplitude.

Online robcfg

  • Supporter
  • 6128 Plus
  • *
  • Posts: 1.743
  • Country: es
  • 8-Bit Technomancer
    • index.php?action=treasury
  • Liked: 667
Re: Improving the CPCs sound capabilities.
« Reply #4 on: Yesterday at 12:53 »
Well, it could always be done as an expansion like the CTC-AY board in which case it would be like any other expansion board, no need to modify the CPC itself.

Offline Targhan

  • Supporter
  • 464 Plus
  • *
  • Posts: 418
  • Country: fr
  • Liked: 331
Re: Improving the CPCs sound capabilities.
« Reply #5 on: Yesterday at 12:56 »
On a side-note: how many people actually own the PlayCity, have developed software upon it, have created 6/9 tracks music on it? Not many. The upcoming Arkos Tracker 2 may change this, but adopting such hardware is slow. And now you're talking about a AY to CHANGE on the CPC. I'm not sure many will do that.

Online roudoudou

  • CPC6128
  • ****
  • Posts: 289
  • Country: fr
    • urban exploration
  • Liked: 273
Re: Improving the CPCs sound capabilities.
« Reply #6 on: Yesterday at 12:57 »
Plug a gravis on a cpcisa card  :P
use RASM, the best assembler ever made :p

repeat
call code
call sleep
call eat
until alive==1

Offline Bryce

  • The Hardware Guy.
  • Supporter
  • 6128 Plus
  • *
  • Posts: 9.743
  • Country: wf
  • It's not broken, it just hasn't been fixed yet.
    • index.php?action=treasury
  • Liked: 2995
Re: Improving the CPCs sound capabilities.
« Reply #7 on: Yesterday at 14:13 »
Well, it could always be done as an expansion like the CTC-AY board in which case it would be like any other expansion board, no need to modify the CPC itself.

What made it interesting was the fact that it was a drop-in 100% compatible replacement that had room for expansion. If I wanted to strap a new sound chip to the back of the CPC I'd pick something much beefier.

Bryce.

Offline mr_lou

  • 6128 Plus
  • ******
  • Posts: 2.405
  • Country: dk
    • index.php?action=treasury
    • The Music Resource for the Indie Game Developer
  • Liked: 604
Re: Improving the CPCs sound capabilities.
« Reply #8 on: Yesterday at 19:01 »
As a geek chip musician, the interesting part for me is the challenge in seeing what I can create within the limitations of the machine. For me, this challenge is a big part of the hobby.

But also knowing that what I create can be heard by everyone.

Therefor, giving me a device that removes some limitations + narrows my listeners just isn't interesting enough.

The Digibooster was a bit interesting, because I liked the idea of showing that the CPC could produce Protracker like music. But I never found the time to look any further into it.
My eBook about experiencing the Amstrad CPC (and others) as a kid, will be released December 2017!!!
Please help me out by letting me know about your interest by voting in this poll! Thanks!!!

Offline Carnivius

  • Supporter
  • 6128 Plus
  • *
  • Posts: 1.314
  • Country: gb
  • Mayhem Attack Squad
    • index.php?action=treasury
  • Liked: 860
Re: Improving the CPCs sound capabilities.
« Reply #9 on: Yesterday at 21:48 »
As a geek chip musician, the interesting part for me is the challenge in seeing what I can create within the limitations of the machine. For me, this challenge is a big part of the hobby.

But also knowing that what I create can be heard by everyone.

Therefor, giving me a device that removes some limitations + narrows my listeners just isn't interesting enough.

Similar to why I like doing graphics with the original CPC's 27 colour palette and limits and not the Plus' 4096 colours and slight enhancements.   And also why I cannot understand the excitement Speccy folk have over the Spectrum Not...  I mean Next.   Perhaps those die-hard Speccy users really were in denial all these years over loving their machine's quirks and technical limitations?
Favorite CPC games: SwitchBlade, Stryker in the Crypts of Trogan, Turrican II, UN Squadron, Oh Mummy