BFS16 & FAT in the same HD?

[Gryzor]

My German is not that good, but I really don't think that's what he said.

[HAL6128]

But it requires 2 IDE devices...
(you will have to use Google translator probably )

Is it - generally speaking - possible to use two X-Mass devices on a MotherX4 as a Master/Slave configuration?

[Bryce]

My German is not that good, but I really don't think that's what he said.

Eh, actually that is more or less what he said. He really doesn't want to be bothered with it or any of the questions / support requests that he still gets any more. I'm not sure I'd call it abandonware though, more just a finished project where user support has ended.

Bryce.

[TFM]

My German is not that good, but I really don't think that's what he said.

Well, it's my mother tongue. You can rely on what I told. 

Eh, actually that is more or less what he said. He really doesn't want to be bothered with it or any of the questions / support requests that he still gets any more.

Bryce.

Which is a pity, because it's the only DOS for HDD's running with the native OS. [nb]Even if it uses a proprietary format for HD and doesn't work with software requiring more than 64 KB. But there is a trade off for buffering. Which is understandable. [/nb]

[Prodatron]

BDOS is Abandonware

This definition would fit to 99% of all cpc software 
The question is: Why did TFM add this category ONLY for BonnyDOS in the whole CPCWiki? (http://www.cpcwiki.eu/index.php?title=BonnyDOS&diff=86887&oldid=74519)  Did Arnor announced that Maxam, Protext etc is "abandonware", too? It's really a long long time ago, when these products have been updated So I removed this quite senseless category some time ago, as it was too obvious that it was only added by TFM as he seem to have a big problem with BonnyDOS? But the question is: WHY? Maybe because of this post he did 10,5 years ago and then completely failed? ( FutureOS with IDE and FAT next year! - comp.sys.amstrad.8bit ) I have no idea, but I can understand Pentagons concerns very well 

[Gryzor]

Ok guys, please, please take it easy. Personally I tend to agree with both sides - yes it's abandonware but after all what does this mean? It'd be more appropriate if there was a category "under active development", otherwise I should probably auto-move all software pages to the abandonware category...