Rasm Z80 assembler v0.61 [update 2017.10.10]

[roudoudou]

update 2017.10.10 - v0.61

- bugfix var memory leak with data flow
- bugfix preprocessing with data flow not using string endchar
- bugfix var export
- new directive ASSERT


-----------------


Yes! Another assembler! 


- DAMN fast assembling
- integrated crunched sections (LZ48/LZ49/LZ4/ZX7/Exomizer) + load&crunch on the fly
- cartridge generation, amsdos header
- ORG checking, unlimited memory workspaces where labels are shared
- ALL undocumented instructions
- conditionnal macro, unlimited & embeded loops with local labels, switch/case
- floating point engine, mathematical functions, ...
- MAXAM compatibility option
- English & French documentation
- Uninterrupted support

[roudoudou]

for future use

[AMSDOS]

Yes! Another assembler!   

Looks interesting. Looking at some of that code I need to brush up on my assembly, but at least my Assembly is better than my C and was wondering if Translate back to C was an option for this Assembler? 

[roudoudou]

Looks interesting. Looking at some of that code I need to brush up on my assembly, but at least my Assembly is better than my C and was wondering if Translate back to C was an option for this Assembler? 

I think this is a disassembler job, i can modify my old dizasm to do that

[AMSDOS]

Sorry my suggestion is ridiculous (I think) I haven't seen an Assembler translate Assembly back to C, it's unusual I think cause it would only be done to write low-level code into an high-level form. Some early Assembly tutorials for the Amstrad used BASIC and then show equivalent Assembly code which was a good approach, in my case I'm perhaps better at Assembly than C.

[roudoudou]

first official release of Rasm in the first post (only sources today, stand alone executables monday since i do not have a windows dev machine at home)


the license is MIT "expat"

[cpcuser]

Why do you have to compile the thing itself?
greeting

[roudoudou]

Why do you have to compile the thing itself?
greeting

first official release of Rasm in the first post (only sources today, stand alone executables monday since i do not have a windows dev machine at home)


the license is MIT "expat"

wait monday for executables

[roudoudou]

update 2017.03.06:
- new release v032, a few fixes, new directives incl48, incl49 to include a binary file and crunch it on the fly
- Windows executables

[Golem13]

It's a very great job roudoudou. Thanks.
The maxam compability will be a very good point, coz if it's possible to convert a source to your syntax, it's no more possible to assemble the converted source in a maxam assembler.
Do you believe it will be possible to manage the maxam syntax in your assembler ?