Author Topic: Ban of Langweil  (Read 3287 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline TFM

  • Visit the mysteries of the CPC at www.futureos.de
  • Supporter
  • 6128 Plus
  • *
  • Posts: 9.899
  • Country: aq
  • Space Chicken for FutureOS is free!
    • index.php?action=treasury
    • FutureOS - The revolution on CPC!
  • Liked: 1976
  • Likes Given: 4650
Ban of Langweil
« on: 07:30, 13 February 12 »
Well, I just saw (on another site) that Langweil (aka Kangaroo Musique) has been banned.

Is that true? In case of "yes, that's true" continue reading else end here.

Is there any reason for it, or is it just because he is he?

I already thought that hard and extreme times in the CPC Wiki would belong to the past. But history seems to repeat itself in circles. How sad. I wished we all could have a positive future together.



TFM of FutureSoft
Also visit the CPC and Plus users favorite OS: FutureOS - The Revolution on CPC6128 and 6128Plus

Offline Gryzor

  • Administrator
  • 6128 Plus
  • *****
  • Posts: 15.366
  • Country: gr
  • CPC-Wiki maintainer
    • CPCWiki
  • Liked: 3059
  • Likes Given: 5566
Re: Ban of Langweil
« Reply #1 on: 08:02, 13 February 12 »
No, he's not banned. Only from the chat, because it can't be proactively moderated.

Offline TFM

  • Visit the mysteries of the CPC at www.futureos.de
  • Supporter
  • 6128 Plus
  • *
  • Posts: 9.899
  • Country: aq
  • Space Chicken for FutureOS is free!
    • index.php?action=treasury
    • FutureOS - The revolution on CPC!
  • Liked: 1976
  • Likes Given: 4650
Re: Ban of Langweil
« Reply #2 on: 22:06, 13 February 12 »
No, he's not banned. Only from the chat, because it can't be proactively moderated.

Thanks' for the information. Good to know.
 
TFM of FutureSoft
Also visit the CPC and Plus users favorite OS: FutureOS - The Revolution on CPC6128 and 6128Plus

Offline Langweil

  • CPC464
  • **
  • Posts: 14
  • Country: de
  • People say, i am autocorrect…
    • Member of the great VzEkC e.V.
  • Liked: 1
  • Likes Given: 1
Re: Ban of Langweil
« Reply #3 on: 22:54, 13 February 12 »
Everything i post must be readed before by an moderator - and he decides if i am "good enough" to be postet.

Its titled "banned" in this area so - it is banned :-)
 Note: this post will not display until it's been approved by a moderator.
Listen to AY with RealInstruments: http://blog.kangaroo.cmo.de/?dl_id=701

Offline TFM

  • Visit the mysteries of the CPC at www.futureos.de
  • Supporter
  • 6128 Plus
  • *
  • Posts: 9.899
  • Country: aq
  • Space Chicken for FutureOS is free!
    • index.php?action=treasury
    • FutureOS - The revolution on CPC!
  • Liked: 1976
  • Likes Given: 4650
Re: Ban of Langweil
« Reply #4 on: 06:13, 14 February 12 »
Everything i post must be readed before by an moderator - and he decides if i am "good enough" to be postet.

Its titled "banned" in this area so - it is banned :-)
 Note: this post will not display until it's been approved by a moderator.

Well, as Germans we know, our history brings a special responsibility for everything with it. So I would suggest that you just show your excellent (or at least acceptable) forum behaviour and then after some time of peace and positive evolution we will ask Gryzor to switch moderation off.
 
I would suggest for all of us to look forward! However I understand that there is a burdon of the past. Now if we all uphold the rules of Gentlemens communication we really can overcome the past.
 
 
EDIT: Well, that'a not productive now, but I can't resist to mention it. @Langweil: Like in "I show you the mirror" song you get treated now in the same way I got treated some years ago when you and Prodatron had the power here. So take the situation as a lesson of life, a chance for learning. I did handle it that way, and today I know that I haven't been always right, that I was for sure not humble enough and that I did overreact in the older days too often. It was hard for me to see my own imperfection, but I really (tried to) improved my way of interaction with others (I guess). And I assume you are on the very best way right now. Just be a bit patient and things will get better for you too.
 
And nobody is alone here, we are all a community.
 
Let's all togehter look at the things which we have in common (a CPC for example ;))  Don't care about things which could seperate us. We are all one!
 
 
« Last Edit: 06:22, 14 February 12 by TFM/FS »
TFM of FutureSoft
Also visit the CPC and Plus users favorite OS: FutureOS - The Revolution on CPC6128 and 6128Plus

Offline Gryzor

  • Administrator
  • 6128 Plus
  • *****
  • Posts: 15.366
  • Country: gr
  • CPC-Wiki maintainer
    • CPCWiki
  • Liked: 3059
  • Likes Given: 5566
Re: Ban of Langweil
« Reply #5 on: 07:53, 14 February 12 »
We've had enough flames because of you, hence the moderated status - no point in going into the same discussions again.

Offline Langweil

  • CPC464
  • **
  • Posts: 14
  • Country: de
  • People say, i am autocorrect…
    • Member of the great VzEkC e.V.
  • Liked: 1
  • Likes Given: 1
Re: Ban of Langweil
« Reply #6 on: 11:36, 18 February 12 »
i just begged gryzor to remove my entry in the wiki. As he promised to do! As nurgle promised to do!
so why the heck, doesn't he remove my entry totally. Only all the things i've done positive to the scene he deleted, letting his sight of view there with a buch of really bad lies and with my real name in it?
Listen to AY with RealInstruments: http://blog.kangaroo.cmo.de/?dl_id=701

Offline Gryzor

  • Administrator
  • 6128 Plus
  • *****
  • Posts: 15.366
  • Country: gr
  • CPC-Wiki maintainer
    • CPCWiki
  • Liked: 3059
  • Likes Given: 5566
Re: Ban of Langweil
« Reply #7 on: 12:06, 18 February 12 »
Ooh, you sly troll, you! Waiting till the moderation level drops and then you post your crap again :D


Of course noone promised anything at all; I certainly did not and, AFAIK, Nurgle didn't, either (but it's not up to me to say). So stop the bull.


I deleted the positive things? Well, ok, I will reinstate your original post. Happy? The rest, of course, contains not a morsel of a lie and it way more objective and calm than anything you could ever write.

Offline robcfg

  • Supporter
  • 6128 Plus
  • *
  • Posts: 2.265
  • Country: se
  • 8-Bit Technomancer
    • index.php?action=treasury
  • Liked: 1005
  • Likes Given: 2360
Re: Ban of Langweil
« Reply #8 on: 16:19, 18 February 12 »
As for the page on Kangaroo, as I said on another post, why don't we talk there about the productions where he contributed and link to his page?


I mean, this could go on forever which is starting to be annoying, and I think he has the right to ask for his real name not to be shown.

Offline Gryzor

  • Administrator
  • 6128 Plus
  • *****
  • Posts: 15.366
  • Country: gr
  • CPC-Wiki maintainer
    • CPCWiki
  • Liked: 3059
  • Likes Given: 5566
Re: Ban of Langweil
« Reply #9 on: 18:13, 18 February 12 »
Who said we can't talk about his contributions there? IIRC he was the one who deleted these...


Also, I'm sorry but I don't see how Kangaroo has any rights in this place... After everything he's done?

Offline TFM

  • Visit the mysteries of the CPC at www.futureos.de
  • Supporter
  • 6128 Plus
  • *
  • Posts: 9.899
  • Country: aq
  • Space Chicken for FutureOS is free!
    • index.php?action=treasury
    • FutureOS - The revolution on CPC!
  • Liked: 1976
  • Likes Given: 4650
Re: Ban of Langweil
« Reply #10 on: 21:36, 18 February 12 »
Well, it's futil to discuss the past again and again, no agreement will ever be found when very different POVs collide.
 
I would like all of you to consider a suggestion I have. This is the CPC Wiki, so basicly a source of information. And we should handle all pages that way. Let's provide important information in a serious way. That would be all.  ;)
TFM of FutureSoft
Also visit the CPC and Plus users favorite OS: FutureOS - The Revolution on CPC6128 and 6128Plus