Changes

''This article is just a draft. Please improve it, if where you think, it makes sense.''

Commercial software has to be paid for by the user, who wants to use it on his computer. As usually it is usually possible to copy software from disc to disc or in another way, the user has the possibility of not to pay paying for the software he uses but just to copy it from a special sourceinstead. To prevent this behavoir behaviour, software companies started to introduce copy protections during the 80ies1980's.

'''Crackers''' are persons, who are illegally disabling these copy protection mechanism mechanisms in an illegal way order to make commercial software copy-able again. In this way , users are again able to get commercial software for free. As commercial software houses have a lot of costs and have to pay their programmers the sallaryprogrammers' wages, they are not very happy about these crackers, as they are loosing losing money with due to them.

== Pro Arguments pro crackers ==

* Crackers are like modern "Robin Hoods": They steal software from the "bad rich capitalistic companies the money " and distribute it to the "good poor people".* People, who are using cracked software, don't have the money to buy commercial software in any case anyway - so it doesn't matter at all.* As software is spreaded spread more widely, if after it has been cracked, it becomes much more popular. This is also an advantage for the software company.

== Contra Arguments contra crackers ==

* Software companies have a lot of costs, their work is not for free. If people are using cracked software, the company are loosing is losing money and can't keep the amount of employees and the level of quality.* Why should some people pay money for software while other people are getting it for free? At the end it means, that a few customers are paying, so that other illegal guys can use things for free.