Changes
/* Tests on real CPC (by DanyPPC) */
[http://www.cpcwiki.eu/forum/amstrad-cpc-hardware/need-plustest-dsk-testbench-5-output-on-original-cpc-6128/ CPCWiki's forum : Need plustest.dsk testbench 5 output on original CPC 6128]
So 2A is really during 5 NOPs... perhaps MEM_rd has to be slow down with one WAIT_n like for MEM_wr. Perhaps in this case 5T's instruction has not to be slow down. I have to fork r005.8.16c3 to test that. - update : in schematic GateArray does not has "MEM_wr wire" (but MEM_req and RD, so can deduce WR, but in an evil brain's way) - update 2 : all tests failed except one in testbench using this way, perhaps because RFSH_n does also use MREQ_n during M1 cycle. Perhaps WAIT_n generator can detect the current OP Code fetched (that this is conform to [http://www.google.com/patents/US5313621 Patent US5313621 : Programmable wait states generator for a microprocessor and computer system utilizing it ]).
About testbench border effects, I think that IO_ACKed instructions has to be under same rules (MEM_wr, modulo 4 etc) - update : same result in testbench using this way.
