Difference between revisions of "Talk:CPC parties"
From CPCWiki - THE Amstrad CPC encyclopedia!
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think it will be MUCH better to sort the Parties only by year, instead by country. So we can add a (City, Country) behind every Party, wich will make it much easier to get a view over all parties cpc related without having borders in mind [[User:Kangaroo|Kangaroo MusiQue of HJT]] 20:38, 9 August 2006 (CEST) | I think it will be MUCH better to sort the Parties only by year, instead by country. So we can add a (City, Country) behind every Party, wich will make it much easier to get a view over all parties cpc related without having borders in mind [[User:Kangaroo|Kangaroo MusiQue of HJT]] 20:38, 9 August 2006 (CEST) | ||
| + | :Yes, peace on earth ;-) But I am just thinking about categorizing the parties. Even now the list is already very very big. So IMHO we have a better overview, when we separate the parties by countries, too. It's not because of creating borders. -- [[User:Prodatron|Prodatron]] 21:33, 9 August 2006 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 15:33, 9 August 2006
I think it will be MUCH better to sort the Parties only by year, instead by country. So we can add a (City, Country) behind every Party, wich will make it much easier to get a view over all parties cpc related without having borders in mind Kangaroo MusiQue of HJT 20:38, 9 August 2006 (CEST)
- Yes, peace on earth ;-) But I am just thinking about categorizing the parties. Even now the list is already very very big. So IMHO we have a better overview, when we separate the parties by countries, too. It's not because of creating borders. -- Prodatron 21:33, 9 August 2006 (CEST)
