New and quick CPC-resource for games:
http://retropower.eu/cpc/ (http://retropower.eu/cpc/)
Please send me missing games/apps/everything interesting
Doy you have a list?
Exits a new version of GoodCPC with many new things :
http://www.aep-emu.de/PNphpBB2-file-viewtopic-t-14763.html (http://www.aep-emu.de/PNphpBB2-file-viewtopic-t-14763.html)
http://www.aep-emu.de/emus31.html (http://www.aep-emu.de/emus31.html)
It's useful. A no-frills approach, just go and download a file you want quickly with no fuss. Maybe incorporate it to the wiki? :)
Quote from: Devilmarkus on 10:55, 29 June 10
Please send me missing games/apps/everything interesting
Do you have an upload feature?
BTW: It's always funny to see this file "FutureOS Utilities english UK 19xx". Think you have robbed a ROMs bank ;-) Who writes the history... and who watches the watchmen?
I hope I am not asking a total n00b question here, but what are the [a1] or [a3] etc versions of downloads? I see this all over the internet for all the various computers and it has bugged me for years!
It's like a variant.
[a1] [a2]:
Same game and probably same disk offset but small differencies in image structure.
So, if [a1] doesn't work, probably [a2] works.
That's what I always assumed but then I thought, what is the point of having duplications instead of just one file that actually works?
Well I only uploaded files from my archive.
I am creating a game database for several systems here. (Amiga, CPC, ....)
If you prefer games and utilities with more details, look on http://cpc-power.com
I hope my question did not sound like a criticism, I was just asking about something I have seen across the internet for years and years. So carry on the good work with your site as it is simple and easy to use, which is how I like it!
Quote from: Shredder11 on 18:28, 09 July 10
I hope my question did not sound like a criticism, I was just asking about something I have seen across the internet for years and years. So carry on the good work with your site as it is simple and easy to use, which is how I like it!
I didn't read it as criticism.
I only offer a simple archive. The link to cpc-power.com is for all people who need more facts and infos.
(I am adminning that site, too... WebCPC section.)
Quote from: Shredder11 on 18:21, 09 July 10
That's what I always assumed but then I thought, what is the point of having duplications instead of just one file that actually works?
Well, I don't know about CPC, but for Amiga it was very common to have a version that worked on A500, and another one for A600, and a third one for A1200. An A500 version often just didn't run on an A600.
Quote from: Shredder11 on 18:19, 09 July 10
I hope I am not asking a total n00b question here, but what are the [a1] or [a3] etc versions of downloads? I see this all over the internet for all the various computers and it has bugged me for years!
This notation come certainly from the GoodTools that plan to recognize every good rom available (of course it's impossible to acheive but it's his goal). So you can't arbitrary choose a version and forget the others unless you want people to let your tool down. You have to recognize every version so that explains the [a?] tag...
Well thanks for the good answers and that begs another question; how do the different computer model owners out there know which variant to choose, or is it a case of try every version to see what works for you? I expect this to be the answer seeing as in the Atari ST world, there are so many permutations on which version does what and on which machine and hard drive etc.
I moved the archive to my website and added some more programs:
http://cpc-live.com/data/list.php
Quote from: Shredder11 on 10:40, 10 July 10
Well thanks for the good answers and that begs another question; how do the different computer model owners out there know which variant to choose, or is it a case of try every version to see what works for you? I expect this to be the answer seeing as in the Atari ST world, there are so many permutations on which version does what and on which machine and hard drive etc.
it's a trial and error thing. It'd be nice to have a format that would tell you more info - heck, even an agreed format on .diz or .nfo files detailing which STOS version to use would be nice!