Testing how quote works... a couple of bugs to iron out.
Quote from: Gryzor on 08:45, 09 March 09
Testing how quote works... a couple of bugs to iron out.
Ok, let's see how the colors appear.
Quote from: Gryzor on 08:45, 09 March 09
Ok, let's see how the colors appear.
hm, the actual quote box still appears in 100% width... darn.
quick reply text
another quick reply test
Gryzor is testing much....
and here's the result:
Hahaha! Is this supposed to be positive or negative? :D
I'm testing two things here: the width of the quote boxes, and also an ajaz-based quick-reply mod. Troubles with both I'm afraid!
Please check CODE embedding. Looks still worse. Also please remove underlining of CODE lines...
Best would be, if CODE is shown in a field.
Cheers,
Markus
Good idea markus
Quote from: CPC-Live on 17:23, 09 March 09
Gryzor is testing much....
and here's the result:
rofl ! dady ! dady ! dady !
"Daddy"? You know something I don't? Have you been talking with my gf? :D :D :D
I see your point Markus, and you're absoluterly right. Gonna try and find the code that defines code quoting; if I find it before pizza is ready I will do it right away, otherwise please excuse me, Battlestar Galactica is waiting :)
testing code:
10 print "Hello world"
program 2:
auto 100
100 cls
110 mode 2
120 print "Hello world"
Ah, I see what the problem is: instead of the system putting it all in a dark grey box with a black outline, it puts each and every line in such a box! So it's not that the lines are underlined, but rather that you have lots of boxes, one of top of the other... I'll see where I can fix this, but pizza is ready I'm afraid :)
Quote from: Gryzor on 19:39, 13 March 09
testing code:
10 print "Hello world"
program 2:
auto 100
100 cls
110 mode 2
120 print "Hello world"
100 MODE 1
200 INPUT"Name:",a$
300 PRINT a$;" says 'hello world!'"
I am better than you :P :P :P :P
(rofl)
Hahaha go to hell :p
Quote from: Gryzor on 19:45, 13 March 09
Hahaha go to hell :p
100 MODE 1
200 PRINT"You will get out of memory soon!"
300 PRINT"Better go to hell ;-)"
400 GOSUB 200
Edit: try it 8) it works
Try giving me the key to your house, it works too :D
Anyway, pushing Play on Battlestar Galactica if you excuse me now :) :) :)
Quote from: Gryzor on 19:51, 13 March 09
Try giving me the key to your house, it works too :D
Anyway, pushing Play on Battlestar Galactica if you excuse me now :) :) :)
No battle, no fight, only joking ;D
(press play then any key: where the hell is this fu**ing any key?)
Oooh I see a mod: a dvd player inside a 464 case... now THAT would be cool!!!!!
I know you were joking, so were I of course :)
Now LET ME EAT PIZZAAAAAAAAAAA
Quote from: Gryzor on 19:56, 13 March 09
Oooh I see a mod: a dvd player inside a 464 case...
We all remember about what Gryzor is talking:
back in the 90s, Goldstar became LG and co-operated with Amstrad for the last production-line of the 464.
This had a built-in DVD drive and also the RSX-command |DVD to watch movies.
Like this on my photo:
Only problem: the new BSG didn't exist back then. :p
Btw, I tried to fix the problem a bit. I know it's still not perfect, but it's more readable, isn't it?
Yes it's better...
But the font is very large now.
Could be a bit smaller.
Also would be cool, if scrollbars would appear if CODE is longer than 15/20 lines.
Look my posting here: Click (http://cpcwiki.eu/forum/index.php/topic,109.msg922.html#new)
10 PRINT"Hello World"
20 GOTO 10
10 PRINT"Hello World"
20 GOTO 10
Looks different: CODE and PRE.
Can't you use settings from preformatted text? (PRE)
There you go. Somewhat smaller font. Scrollbars appeared over the 24-line limit, I brought it down to 20 lines.
Hm, I just noticed your PRE vs Code note. You really think it's better?
Oh, it seems I also fixed the box going around the entire code piece :)
[EDIT]Oops no I didn't, it broke the forum's logo and had to revert...
[EDIT2] Fixed now - I think :)
Looks good now!
Thank you
10 print"finally got it
20 print"booya!
Hi Gryzor,
please check signatures when an user edited his posting.
add a < br > after "Last edited ......" ;)
Hm? but why? Looks right to me... let's check.
(this is post-post editing)
But it looks ok! What do you see?
Hm, Opera, Chrome and IE8 render it fine. Only FF fails to do it properly, but will look into it and maybe add an extra BR tag... thanks for letting me know :)