News:

Printed Amstrad Addict magazine announced, check it out here!

Main Menu
avatar_rexbeng

Has anyone noticed Commodore's return from the dead?

Started by rexbeng, 16:09, 13 July 25

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

pelrun

Quote from: chinnyhill10 on 23:15, 26 July 25Italian copyright law is a little 'tricky' in this area

The software is copyrighted. The name "Commodore" is trademarked (when selling computer goods). They are completely different things. You can't copyright the word "commodore", because it's an existing english word, not a creation.

Quote from: andycadley on 01:02, 27 July 25You have to be actively trading with them or they automatically expire.

It amazes me that people keep believing this. You really think big business in this era of end-stage capitalism would let trademark law be that hostile to them? The bar to keep a trademark alive is so low it's on the floor, well below "actively traded". As long as there's *anyone* still saying "hey, we own the mark", even if they've got no actual plans to use it, then good luck getting a court to invalidate it.

andycadley

Quote from: pelrun on 14:24, 27 July 25It amazes me that people keep believing this. You really think big business in this era of end-stage capitalism would let trademark law be that hostile to them? The bar to keep a trademark alive is so low it's on the floor, well below "actively traded". As long as there's *anyone* still saying "hey, we own the mark", even if they've got no actual plans to use it, then good luck getting a court to invalidate it.


It's a really low bar and any effort to defend a trademark is usually sufficient. The fact nobody has been defending the trademark for the last decade is the issue at hand. Although I believe this Italian Commodore outfit have lost attempts to claim the chicken head logo in the past (but have go a variant with CBM on it or something), which suggests their claim isn't as solid as they seem to suggest.

Shaun M. Neary

Quote from: pelrun on 14:24, 27 July 25It amazes me that people keep believing this. You really think big business in this era of end-stage capitalism would let trademark law be that hostile to them? The bar to keep a trademark alive is so low it's on the floor, well below "actively traded". As long as there's *anyone* still saying "hey, we own the mark", even if they've got no actual plans to use it, then good luck getting a court to invalidate it.

Sorry but that's *exactly* how copyright works.
If an intellectual property is that important to you, you'll protect it as much as you'll protect your first born!

Not trying to be a dick here, but that's how it works. Don't like it? Move to Cuba!
Currently playing on: 2xCPC464, 1xCPC6128, 1x464Plus, 1x6128Plus, 2xGX4000. M4 board, ZMem 1MB and still forever playing Bruce Lee.
No cheats, snapshots or emulation. I play my games as they're intended to be played. What about you?

pelrun

Quote from: Shaun M. Neary on 18:52, 27 July 25Sorry but that's *exactly* how copyright works.
If an intellectual property is that important to you, you'll protect it as much as you'll protect your first born!


I think you both misread what I said and got the sense backwards, which is an impressive feat.  :P

andycadley

Quote from: pelrun on 03:50, 28 July 25
Quote from: Shaun M. Neary on 18:52, 27 July 25Sorry but that's *exactly* how copyright works.
If an intellectual property is that important to you, you'll protect it as much as you'll protect your first born!


I think you both misread what I said and got the sense backwards, which is an impressive feat.  :P

You seem to be suggesting that Perifractic's Commodore trademark will stand because "big business". Is that not your opinion?

The way I see it, Perifractic's Commodore isn't "big business" and this crowd from Italy may not be that big, but they're still probably bigger... 

pelrun

No, I said "trademarks don't have to be actively traded to retain their legal protections", and "copyrights aren't trademarks". That's it.

It's only the specific things I quoted that I was responding to.

(the bit about "big business" was "trademark law is written to benefit big business, not hinder it", and expiring trademarks is a hinderance.)

chinnyhill10

Heard a rumour they paid 2 million Euros for the rights. Ouch.

How many C64 Ultimates do they need to sell to cover that? The sales tracker shows its on about 7000 sales in just under a month but the sales rate has nosedived after the initial launch.

If some of the pre-order money has had to go in to fund this purchase, that could make things even trickier.

Meanwhile the Next is on 5000 for the THIRD batch and I imagine they know their costs pretty well and have everything pretty much nailed on.

I know where I'd stick 300 quid if I had it!
--
ChinnyVision - Reviews Of Classic Games Using Original Hardware
chinnyhill10 - YouTube

Gryzor

Quote from: chinnyhill10 on 13:22, 04 August 25Heard a rumour they paid 2 million Euros for the rights. Ouch.

How many C64 Ultimates do they need to sell to cover that? The sales tracker shows its on about 7000 sales in just under a month but the sales rate has nosedived after the initial launch.

If some of the pre-order money has had to go in to fund this purchase, that could make things even trickier.

Meanwhile the Next is on 5000 for the THIRD batch and I imagine they know their costs pretty well and have everything pretty much nailed on.

I know where I'd stick 300 quid if I had it!
If indeed they want to cover that with this campaign, then... ouch.

But seriously, who would give 2 million for the name?

pelrun

They're planning to run a business under the name. It'd be mad to do it *just* for a clone C64 which is already designed - and in any case, it sounds like they have a separate licensing agreement for that particular product that will continue even if the overall deal falls through.

andycadley

Quote from: pelrun on 17:21, 05 August 25They're planning to run a business under the name. It'd be mad to do it *just* for a clone C64 which is already designed - and in any case, it sounds like they have a separate licensing agreement for that particular product that will continue even if the overall deal falls through.
I believe the deal has gone through at this point (accompanied by various extremely cringe photos and videos). Still 2 million in profit that needs to be paid back to somewhere is an awful lot (especially when much of it may be from investors who want actual returns on their investment too).

Maybe the retro market can sustain that much, but I'd be surprised. I will not be the least bit surprised when various Commodore branded merchant starts flooding out to raise cash.

Anthony Flack

A T shirt licensing deal would probably be the most profitable way to exploit the Commodore brand right now.

But if I was going to start a new business, and the choice was a) be called Commodore or b) have a spare 2 million Euros... well, that money could pay for a lot of things. I hope they didn't pay that much. 

Powered by SMFPacks Menu Editor Mod