Quote from: mmldrm on Yesterday at 13:29Quote from: SerErris on Yesterday at 12:05That is what you can get for that price and it is on the low end of usable, however still massively better than a multimeter for digital cirquits. You can actually see what the lines are doing (up, down etc). And exact timing (e.g. fractions of a µs) is not important here.Hi. I do appreciate the suggestion of the ZT-702S/ZT-703S. I'm just clueless regarding what level of oscilloscope is sufficient for this kind of work.
Also the next better suited would be a proper oscilloscope like the Rigol 1054z (or any other entry level brand and model). But you know, it is even used for 200-300€ .. So I did not recommend it here, but that would be actually my normal recommendation to get into an Oscilloscope.
Nowadays you can get the new Rigol DHO800 series, with the DHO804 the cheapest option. That goes for ~400 Euros. This is a huge upstep with 12bit resolution vs 8bit of the old Rigol and 100Mhz vs. 50Mhz.
So I was a little disheartened to be told that the ZT-702S isn't really up to the job of helping to diagnose the issue here, after buying it for that purpose.
I've requested a return on the ZT-702S. Hopefully that will work out and I can spend the money on a Dandanator instead.
I can also almost hear the shouts of "replace the damn RAM chips" and to be honest it does regularly cross my mind to do this, but I would love for a positive confirmation via McArti0'd tests before desoldering anything.
I hope the above doesn't sound too ungrateful! Thanks again for taking the time to reply here.
Quote from: Benedikt on Yesterday at 20:04A pair of big SRAM chips sounds more practical, these days.What I mean more is two banks of internal memory larger than 64kB
Quote from: SerErris on Yesterday at 12:16Building the GA in TTL logic like the KC compact did will overcome this topic.And it makes pixel generation (almost) trivially expandable in some ways.
Quote from: McArti0 on Yesterday at 18:49necessarily in the CPC6512 style, i.e. with 41256-70 (or 44256)A pair of big SRAM chips sounds more practical, these days.
Quote from: mmldrm on Yesterday at 13:29McArti0'd tests before desoldering anythingLet's GO!
Quote from: McArti0 on Yesterday at 12:36Have You DM74 or SN74?
Quote from: Benedikt on 19:27, 14 May 24Quote from: Bryce on 12:18, 14 May 24some work in this direction has been done in the past. I know I've seen details of a modern KC Compact design using all western 74 Series IC's, complete with a PCB layout. This could save you a lot of the initial groundwork. Maybe someone here knows where it can be found. If not, I can check my archives too.I am only aware of a modern redesign of the expansion unit that contains the floppy disk controller and the upper 64 KiB of RAM.
If there is a redesign of the system board, too, that could indeed be interesting.
Quote from: SerErris on Yesterday at 12:05That is what you can get for that price and it is on the low end of usable, however still massively better than a multimeter for digital cirquits. You can actually see what the lines are doing (up, down etc). And exact timing (e.g. fractions of a µs) is not important here.Hi. I do appreciate the suggestion of the ZT-702S/ZT-703S. I'm just clueless regarding what level of oscilloscope is sufficient for this kind of work.
Also the next better suited would be a proper oscilloscope like the Rigol 1054z (or any other entry level brand and model). But you know, it is even used for 200-300€ .. So I did not recommend it here, but that would be actually my normal recommendation to get into an Oscilloscope.
Nowadays you can get the new Rigol DHO800 series, with the DHO804 the cheapest option. That goes for ~400 Euros. This is a huge upstep with 12bit resolution vs 8bit of the old Rigol and 100Mhz vs. 50Mhz.
Page created in 0.120 seconds with 16 queries.