Changes
/* Splitting article into smaller pieces */
:::::::: I completly agree.. This way one could compare the workings of different dialects of basic side by side ... Eg. Locomotive Basic vs. BBC Basic!
::::::::: This doesn't seem to have been discussed for a while. Let me offer my thoughts as an experienced wiki user but a newcomer to CPCWiki. The article [[Locomotive BASIC]] should be limited to an historical perspective without trying to explain every command. The list of commands should be split off with a link, I would be in favour of a single page with all of the commands and examples listed. If each command has its own page then as [[User:C2r|C2r]] said, you would end up with a lot of very small articles. I would be opposed to separate articles for each command. The only commands complex enough to justify this would be <code>PRINT</code>, <code>SOUND</code>, <code>ENT</code> and <code>ENV</code> as far as I can tell. My Locomotive BASIC is still very good, I don't mind writing example code to include. [[User:CJ Dennis|CJ Dennis]] 02:24, 27 January 2008 (CET)
