Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Talk:FutureOS

384 bytes added, 21:33, 12 January 2009
The following pointer based HID hardware should be removed from the list of "supported hardware". This hardware is not suported by the "os" itself, as applications can't use or access it by themself with the help of fos. This hardware is (if at all) only used by a sub-program, the fileselector module. The support itself is not an "OS feature" at all. So if you call fos an "OS" it's not possible to mention this hardware as "supported".
Please correct me, if I am wrong. Otherwise the following sections should be removed.
'''Graphic Tablet'''
*Hegetron [[Grafpad II|Grafpad II]]
'''Joysticks<br>'''
*Analog Joystick (6128 Plus)
*Digital Joystick 1
*Digital Joystick 2
'''Light-Pens<br>'''
*[[Dk'tronics Lightpen|Dk'tronics]]
*Happy-Computer
*Lindy
'''Mouses'''
*[[AMX Mouse|AMX_Mouse]]
*[[Atari-ST mouse adapter|Atari ST]] (Schneider Magazin)
*CPC-Mousepack (Reisware)
*CPC-Mousepack 2.0 (Reisware)
*Geos (c64)
*[[SYMBiFACE II:PS/2 mouse|PS/2 mouse]] (Symbiface)
'''Trackballs'''
*[[Atari-ST mouse adapter|Atari ST]] (Schneider Magazin)
*[[Marconi|Marconi]]
[[User:Prodatron|Prodatron]] 02:11, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
:Indeed you are wrong, all these devices are supported by FutureOS, just connect it to the CPC. You can use them to control the Desktop or for foreigen programs. Naturally the Plus devices (analogue joystick etc.) are only usable by a CPC Plus. All devices can be accesseb by OS routines. See documentation. So I&nbsp;have to correct your updates, because they are just wrong. And by the way I'm waiting for an excuse for your insulting phrases. [[TFM|TFM]].
There is no sense in using a graphic tablet in a sprite converter like GMSK. But if you like this function included I&nbsp;can do that for you. The Grafpad is for entering graphical data or for fast selection. There is a routine (read ROM&nbsp;a documentation) which provide the desired features, it deals with keyboard and different joysticks. Only for the Grafpad there is at the moment no application available, but why don't you make one?
:::Thanks, that is what I wanted to know. So there is no routine in the OS available for applications to support the grafpad. But this is what I already said. So the grafpad, the mouse etc. can be removed from the "support" list. [[User:Prodatron|Prodatron]] 21:25, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
However, this is NOT the question. FutureOS supports the Graphpad and the other applications. So please let me restore the article now. [[TFM|TFM]].
:::Not the OS supports it but the file selector module. This doesn't help me in an application at all. Or is Fos only a program starter? If it's only a program starter, then I am fine with the "support" list. Somehow it seems, that you don't know, what an OS is at all? [[User:Prodatron|Prodatron]] 21:25, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 
:::: Well, I think that for calmness' sake at least, if it is indeed supported and working in the file selector we can leave it in... But, GMSK - if there's no use for the Pad in it then why mention it supports it? It can support lemon and strawberry flavors as well, but it just doesn't make any sense... [[User:Gryzor|Gryzor]]
<br>The following hardware doesn't seem to be supported as well:
*[[CPC Booster|CPC Booster(+)]]&nbsp;
*HD64180 Coprocessor card
*IDE hard discs (173 KB/s with [[IDE8255|IDE8255]], 162 KB/s with [[CPC-IDE|CPC-IDE]] or [[SYMBiFACE II|SYMBiFACE II]])
Regarding the last one, there maybe routines for reading and writing some single sectors (btw. such small routines can be downloaded here: [[SYMBiFACE II:IDE routines|SYMBiFACE_II:IDE_routines]]&nbsp;;-)). This is a feature of a BIOS, not of an OS. Both IDE interfaces are still completely useless for applications in Fos, as long as they don't implement the filesystem by themself (which would be quite crazy of course).
Regarding the Rom expansions, I don't understand the reason, why they are listed, too? Only because of the fact, that Fos requires 4 roms to be able to run? The other thing is, that they are all compatible, so it's senseless to list them all. It would be the same like mentioning all Atari-compatible Digital-Joysticks (Competition Pro, Quickshot, Jet Fighter etc.) in the Joystick section. Seems, that these entries are only for blowing up the list.
[[User:Prodatron|Prodatron]] 13:58, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
<br>
:Again you're wrong. The IDE support is in the IDE ROM&nbsp;of FutureOS. Everybody can download it. The CPC Booster support is maybe few, but no questioin still existing in the core OS ROMs.
::No, CBM is not a part of Fos&nbsp;:-) It is a piece of source code which has to be copied into the source code of the application. Would you say, that all RSX extensions ever developed in history are "a part" of Locomotive Basic, and would you list all these in the Locomotive Basic article?? No, definitely not! [[User:Prodatron|Prodatron]] 18:59, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
::Hello?&nbsp;You want to know it better than the programmer? If CBM is not a part of FutureOS, then is sos not existing at all. Do you know what you say? Think about this!
:::Seems, that you don't know the difference between a library and an OS component. [[User:Prodatron|Prodatron]] 21:25, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
:A RSX extension. NO, really NOT. You are absolutely wrong, in CBM only the text (and very few routines) are linked to the application. Only the things that are DIFFERENT in every application. The main code is in the ROMs. And who cares about ROM&nbsp;or not ROM. You are on the woodway. [[TFM|TFM]].
:: If I use a textoutput routine of the CPC-OS in my RSX extension, yes, then I use a routine of the OS. That still doesn't make my RSX extension to a part of the OS. [[User:Prodatron|Prodatron]] 21:25, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
:Further only the compatible and tested ROM&nbsp;expansions are listed. Joysticks are not ROM&nbsp;boards. And for sure the sos is not able to use them all. Or have you tried Super ROMbard Plus (provides ROMs with ROM&nbsp;selects 16-31)?&nbsp;The world it not that simple as you think.
1,963
edits