Difference between revisions of "Talk:GMSK"
From CPCWiki - THE Amstrad CPC encyclopedia!
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is this an official piece of software or a group-internal application? Where can it be downloaded? | Is this an official piece of software or a group-internal application? Where can it be downloaded? | ||
| + | |||
if it is a "internal" part of a game-dev-system its surely not worth to mention in the wiki. so maybe you can provide a download link for those who are interested in. | if it is a "internal" part of a game-dev-system its surely not worth to mention in the wiki. so maybe you can provide a download link for those who are interested in. | ||
| + | |||
Also the article is too much like a manual, wich is not the meaning of a wiki. so maybe you can do a manual for download and add this as an pdf to the wiki-article.<br> | Also the article is too much like a manual, wich is not the meaning of a wiki. so maybe you can do a manual for download and add this as an pdf to the wiki-article.<br> | ||
| + | |||
Regards, Kangaroo <br> | Regards, Kangaroo <br> | ||
| + | |||
| − | : Yes, this article should be splitted into two articles. IMHO publishing manuals in the CPC-Wiki for any software is always welcome, but it should be separated from the main article. The main article should be there to inform about the software, not to teach about how to use it. Otherwise it's harder to read an article, if it's mixed with manual stuff. [[User:Prodatron|Prodatron]] 16:03, 4 January 2009 (UTC) | + | :Yes, this article should be splitted into two articles. IMHO publishing manuals in the CPC-Wiki for any software is always welcome, but it should be separated from the main article. The main article should be there to inform about the software, not to teach about how to use it. Otherwise it's harder to read an article, if it's mixed with manual stuff. [[User:Prodatron|Prodatron]] 16:03, 4 January 2009 (UTC) |
| + | |||
| + | :: I wouldn't be against including the instructions in the main article, but it should be just one section of the it, not the whole article. [[User:Gryzor|Gryzor]] | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| + | |||
Thank you for asking. The link has been introduced. [[TFM|TFM]]. | Thank you for asking. The link has been introduced. [[TFM|TFM]]. | ||
| + | |||
| − | : Thanks. Now its complete! Kangaroo | + | :Thanks. Now its complete! Kangaroo |
Latest revision as of 13:43, 4 January 2009
Is this an official piece of software or a group-internal application? Where can it be downloaded?
if it is a "internal" part of a game-dev-system its surely not worth to mention in the wiki. so maybe you can provide a download link for those who are interested in.
Also the article is too much like a manual, wich is not the meaning of a wiki. so maybe you can do a manual for download and add this as an pdf to the wiki-article.
Regards, Kangaroo
- Yes, this article should be splitted into two articles. IMHO publishing manuals in the CPC-Wiki for any software is always welcome, but it should be separated from the main article. The main article should be there to inform about the software, not to teach about how to use it. Otherwise it's harder to read an article, if it's mixed with manual stuff. Prodatron 16:03, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- I wouldn't be against including the instructions in the main article, but it should be just one section of the it, not the whole article. Gryzor
Thank you for asking. The link has been introduced. TFM.
- Thanks. Now its complete! Kangaroo
