Quote from: zhulien on 02:35, 06 September 21Hi!
Hi Everyone,
This thread is to track those who would like a new Tecnobytes V9990 Graphics card (MX4 version) for their Amstrad CPC.
http://www.tecnobytes.com.br/p/v9990-powergraph_10.html (http://www.tecnobytes.com.br/p/v9990-powergraph_10.html)
Tecnobytes has stated if they get 30 orders minimum for a batch, they can do a batch.
As I get more info I will update here - such as the pricing I am still waiting on.
If you want more than 1 for a next batch, please post here. I will try summarise.
Quote from: Joseman on 09:59, 06 September 21
Hi!
what will be the price of the card? (more or less)
Quote from: TotO on 13:38, 06 September 21
I'm not interrested, because there is no DIN passthrough to plug it on the same display as the CPC.
Quote from: Trebmint on 15:34, 06 September 21
There is the monitor issue with the technobytes g9k card. I know that Prodatron still has a batch of a dozen or so that he's never passed because of this issue.
This issue needs to be sorted before more are made I think.
Quote from: XeNoMoRPH on 09:45, 07 September 21
I bought the V9990 Light MSX version, a year or so ago more or less, otherwise I would be delighted to participate, but I like that people are interested in the card so that more people have it, so we can get things done, now that we have the Quigs Q9k :D
Quote from: teopl on 18:00, 08 September 21
Is is possible to have MSX V9990? I have AMSDAP42 and I would like to use it with this card?
In any case - count me in for 1. (I hope MSX version)
Quote from: HigashiJun on 05:32, 12 September 21is there any software for V9990 since 5 years the card is used on CPC?
Cone on, guys !
Just 15 fellows ?
:(
Quote from: HigashiJun on 05:32, 12 September 21I want one, but i'm waiting for the price, because i'm a little short of money.
Cone on, guys !
Just 15 fellows ?
:(
Quote from: roudoudou on 09:05, 12 September 21Some cool projects are being made with quigs.
is there any software for V9990 since 5 years the card is used on CPC?
Quote from: Joseman on 09:15, 12 September 21
Some cool projects are being made with quigs.
And even the Symbos version that run this software hasn't been released (I think)
Sure 30+ owners of the card will speed up things
It's a matter of time in my opinion.
Quote from: TotO on 11:01, 12 September 21Quigs g9k developer should be released near the end of this month, which allows cross development of g9k games on symbos. Edo has already got Flappy bird [size=78%]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTOV4d5Eq4E (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTOV4d5Eq4E)[/size][/size][size=78%] working using Quigs and more is to follow. The plan is to make developing so easy that people have a go, and perhaps we the g9k will get some software after all these years[/size]
@Joseman (https://www.cpcwiki.eu/forum/index.php?action=profile;u=135) The V9990 was originally intended for the MSX3, but the machine was canceled. The first video card to use it appeared around 1992 and for almost 30 years you can count on the fingers of your hand the amount of projects carried out for the legitimate machine in its day.
Even SymbOS is satisfied with a 16-color mode for "compatibility" which does not take advantage of its real specificities.
Also, I doubt that it is on CPC that its use comes to life when the circuit is hardly available for some time.
For fans of video game creation, there is the Mega Drive which costs less than the card, with a magnificent game library and very advanced development tools for beginners who want to have fun with its big sister Yamaha VDP. :)
Quote from: TotO on 20:41, 13 September 21There's already hundreds of MSX2 games, so why bother?
Well... I agree since the begin that offering a common graphic solution for SymbOS allows to have universal applications on it. Now, I thing the V9990 is not the good choice compared to the V9938/58 VDP for that usage (opening all the MSX 1/2 games to our computer). Flappy Bird? :-\
Quote from: Trebmint on 21:43, 13 September 21They are around 100 games dedicated to the MSX2, but that is not the question...
There's already hundreds of MSX2 games, so why bother?
Quote from: TotO on 23:32, 13 September 21The hardware and software already exists. I don't see the point in stopping and starting to downgrade the specs.
They are around 100 games dedicated to the MSX2, but that is not the question...
The question is about a common graphic chip for "universal" SymbOS programs on MSX/CPC and the best to acheive that is to use the MSX2 VDP because many great programs can be adapted to run on MSX1 and CPC in this way.
Quote from: Trebmint on 00:50, 14 September 21I don't said to stop anything, but that was not a best choice to select the MSX3 VDP for this usage, as explain previously.
The hardware and software already exists. I don't see the point in stopping and starting to downgrade the specs.
Quote from: Joseman on 09:12, 12 September 21
I want one, but i'm waiting for the price, because i'm a little short of money.
Quote from: zhulien on 05:37, 14 September 21Ok, count me for 1 unit then.
USD $115 + shipping
Quote from: zhulien on 05:37, 14 September 21
USD $115 + shipping
Quote from: GUNHED on 04:16, 15 September 21because it was used in MSX2 so there is already plenty of softwares
But why move back to 9958?
Quote from: gflorez on 09:54, 15 September 21Yes, the V99x8 are already supported by SymbOS that already made existing applications for the OS runable for a CPC with it.
Because there is no such move back, the V9958 is already supported on SymbOS-MSX.
Managing the same hardware on different computers is a mater of to known the Z80 ports where the device has been interfaced.
But to have a V9958 hypothetically interfaced to a CPC does not mean automatic access to the MSX library of games, they would need to be converted one by one from scratch. One of the big reasons is: because the MSXs manage 8 bit ports(ignore the higher byte), and the CPCs manage full 16 bit ports. This detail alone forces to rewrite all port accesses. Also, 16 bit ports make the code a little slower than with 8 bits ports.
Quote from: gflorez on 15:34, 15 September 21I know, as I have said that to him by email/PM or at the Revision event.
The selection of the CPC ports for MSX hardware.... that is something that was decided by Prodatron, and I don't know from who he took the idea. The target was to fix the upper byte to &FF on the MSX adapter, and so, every &FFXX port access triggers only the lower byte, &XX, to the cartridge.
Quote from: gflorez on 15:34, 15 September 21What I want to say is, the CPC &FFXX range was selected time before making the real adapter, the Amsdap. It was not a chance.Sorry, the problem is the "chance" word into my sentence. I mean the luck to have a 16-bit I/O port to allow that.
Quote from: gflorez on 15:46, 15 September 21I encourage any development of a V9958 graphics card, it would be great. But... apart from the difference on the ports, the MSX games make an intensive use of libraries on Roms, that would force the conversion coders to add translation Roms on the CPC versions.Another drawback is the use of different memory paginations on CPC and MSX.----About the Coleco, SG1000/SC3000 conversions to MSX, these machines are pre-MSX, so they share more hardware architecture than only the Video chip with the MSX.Well... The Coleco and SG1000 do not have the MSX ROM or paging system too. The CPC already have the same CPU and sound chip, while them have the same CPU and VDP. Anyway, it does not apply to the existing SymbOS programs.
Quote from: TotO on 15:54, 15 September 21
I know, as I have said that to him by email/PM or at the Revision event.
Sorry, the problem is the "chance" word into my sentence. I mean the luck to have a 16-bit I/O port to allow that.
Well... The Coleco and SG1000 do not have the MSX ROM or paging system too. The CPC already have the same CPU and sound chip, while them have the same CPU and VDP. Anyway, it does not apply to the existing SymbOS programs.
Quote from: TotO on 11:45, 15 September 21
Yes, the V99x8 are already supported by SymbOS that already made existing applications for the OS runable for a CPC with it.
Quote from: Trebmint on 10:55, 15 September 21Totally agreed! :) :) :)
I'm not sure why people would want to move backwards from a v9990 to v9958. The v9990 is so superior, already exists/works, and does anyone really believe that people will port MSX2 games too the CPC.
Quote from: gflorez on 19:10, 15 September 21Exactly.
Ok, now I understand it. You meant the opportunity to have a spare 256 port range at &FFXX.
Quote from: Edoz(MSX) on 19:29, 15 September 21Hopefully Trebmint will release his new QUIGS? The IDE so far is quite impressive and interesting and the language easy to understand. I mean, SymbOS is a very attractive environment, also due to it's very good and deep documentation. But you still need to be an machine code professional to create something. QUIGS could be an approach for Non-Professional/Nerds (like me) to program at least something? Would be cool.
The v9990 is on the MSX an add- on card. I see it more like the Voodoo card for MSX and now for CPC and ENTERPRISE as well. Running it on different machines would be cool as one release for a game will work on all the machines and no porting is required. Yes there is less software for it but I would hope people will like it and start there own devs for it
Quote from: HAL 6128 on 11:12, 16 September 21There will be a release of Quigs with g9k support very soon (within a week). Yesterday we had the great news that Prodatron has worked out the g9k interrupt, so when I receive the updated symbos I will try to get that included.... this will mean really cool stuff can be done :) Currently I'm adding lots of use cases to the optimizer... I want the Quigs compiler to produce the fastest ever z80 compiled code.
Hopefully Trebmint will release his new QUIGS? The IDE so far is quite impressive and interesting and the language easy to understand. I mean, SymbOS is a very attractive environment, also due to it's very good and deep documentation. But you still need to be an machine code professional to create something. QUIGS could be an approach for Non-Professional/Nerds (like me) to program at least something? Would be cool.
...and after embedding the driver/language support for the V9990 the OPL2 / Adlib sound cards with Pulkomandys Willy adapter or the LambdaSpeak / Midi-Board (with same sound chip) could also be enhanced by Trebmint? :)
Quote from: Edoz(MSX) on 13:35, 25 September 21
Here you can find the new G9K BETA release for Quigs:
https://www.msx.org/forum/msx-talk/development/new-symbos-development-quigs-beta-release-with-g9k-support (https://www.msx.org/forum/msx-talk/development/new-symbos-development-quigs-beta-release-with-g9k-support)
Quote from: zhulien on 15:03, 04 October 21There seems to be 100s of CPC users here on these forums, but only 17 that want better graphics?I'm one of the 17. The problem may be that the price is high and probably also that it will only be supported by SymbOS.
Quote from: ajcasado on 16:03, 04 October 21
I'm one of the 17. The problem may be that the price is high and probably also that it will only be supported by SymbOS.
For a cheap VGA capable expansion the RPi PICO is a good option. Less than 5€ in Farnell:
https://es.farnell.com/raspberry-pi/raspberry-pi-pico/raspberry-pi-32-bits-arm-cortex/dp/3643332?cjevent=f8ea7a5f250b11ec823501d70a18050d&cjdata=MXxZfDB8WXww&CMP=AFC-CJ-ES-1765328&gross_price=true&source=CJ
See the yet ready extra libraries : https://github.com/raspberrypi/pico-extras.
More functionalities are also implemented in the MCU, as UART(serial port), SPI, I2C, I2S, digital I/O, Analog Input, USB host.
It has 30 GPIO pins, so several of the functionalities (audio, VGA, storage, comms and I/O ) referenced above could be used at the same time in a not very complicated expansion board for de CPC.
It comes with 2MB of flash to support the desired functionalities code and 264kB of RAM that can be used as VRAM and buffers for I/O, storage and audio.
Quote from: zhulien on 16:48, 04 October 21
Something like this interfaced with CPC directly would be a very good CPC gfx card solution because of it's software upgradability. I wonder if @revaldinho (https://www.cpcwiki.eu/forum/index.php?action=profile;u=1776) could easily modify CPCLink to cater for the Pi Pico?
https://picockpit.com/raspberry-pi/raspberry-pi-pico-video-output/ (https://picockpit.com/raspberry-pi/raspberry-pi-pico-video-output/)
Quote from: revaldinho on 00:01, 05 October 21I like the idea of the Pico as a generic video processor for 8 bit CPUs.Yes, it looks more attractive.
Quote from: revaldinho on 00:01, 05 October 21
I haven't see these before, but I like the idea of the Pico as a generic video processor for 8 bit CPUs. This is a totally different direction to the V9990 cards though and might be split off into another thread.
Quote from: Trebmint on 02:47, 05 October 21
So you guys want to buy a cheaper graphics card with no software at all, that has yet to be designed, built, and still not that many people will want... hmmm.
Software is coming for the v9990 that will make more people want this card :)
Quote from: XeNoMoRPH on 08:58, 06 October 21I agree that 20 peoples is probably enough to do a batch if they want to be kind to offer this expansion for the CPC users.
With @Edoz(MSX) (https://www.cpcwiki.eu/forum/index.php?action=profile;u=1188) , there are 20 people interested, I think it's a good number for this expensive hardware, @zhulien (https://www.cpcwiki.eu/forum/index.php?action=profile;u=58) could you talk to Tecnobytes to try to lower their requirements?
Quote from: XeNoMoRPH on 08:58, 06 October 21
With @Edoz(MSX) (https://www.cpcwiki.eu/forum/index.php?action=profile;u=1188) , there are 20 people interested, I think it's a good number for this expensive hardware, @zhulien (https://www.cpcwiki.eu/forum/index.php?action=profile;u=58) could you talk to Tecnobytes to try to lower their requirements?
Quote from: HigashiJun on 06:06, 09 October 21
PM sent !
Thank you for your involvement zhulien.
;)
Quote from: zhulien on 09:54, 09 October 21
Hi, I didn't get a PM yet.
You are welcome - I also hope that more people have them so there is more incentive for software to be developed. I have some ideas for it to make it a bit more useful than Symbos - but Symbos itself is really a great piece of software. I will try present my ideas in another thread - they relate to the drivers thread I had previously created.
Quote from: teopl on 09:08, 10 October 21
PM sent 8)
Quote from: teopl on 09:08, 10 October 21
PM sent 8)
Quote from: zhulien on 02:40, 06 September 21
The below users would like a new v9990 graphics card in Mother X4 configuration:
(Details received via PM)(Pending Details)
- zhulien
- Richard_Lloyd
- Joseman
- Skunkfish
- HigashiJun
- ajcasado
- LewisCPC
- Edoz(MSX)
- chilli_taff
- DoctorCPC
- JayBlood
- craem
- AnakinTF
- Luis_CPC
- valfac
- vhenares
- OncleCed
- kawickboy
- teopl
- Poliander
- Drtad
Quote from: zhulien on 02:40, 06 September 21
The below users would like a new v9990 graphics card in Mother X4 configuration:
(Details received via PM)(Pending Details)
- zhulien
- Richard_Lloyd
- Joseman
- Skunkfish
- HigashiJun
- ajcasado
- LewisCPC
- Edoz(MSX)
- chilli_taff
- DoctorCPC
- JayBlood
- craem
- AnakinTF
- Luis_CPC
- valfac
- vhenares
- OncleCed
- kawickboy
- teopl
- Poliander
- Drtad
Quote from: LewisCPC on 21:36, 13 October 21LewisCPC
Quote from: ikari on 22:29, 15 October 21Well I'm currently developing the QG9kEngine for Symbos/Quigs for V9990.... After completing flappy bird, Edo & my first little demo is going to be a micromachines type game. This is just a mice little test of large maps and scrolling.
lol and I bought on ebay 🤦🏻♂️
what can we run on it? ;x
Quote from: zhulien on 17:24, 17 October 21
Hi everyone below, I am still waiting for your details to be PM'd to me so we can place the order. Please let me know also if you do NOT want to go ahead. Thanks.
@Luis_CPC (https://www.cpcwiki.eu/forum/index.php?action=profile;u=4392)
@vhenares (https://www.cpcwiki.eu/forum/index.php?action=profile;u=4378)
@OncleCed (https://www.cpcwiki.eu/forum/index.php?action=profile;u=4391)
@kawickboy (https://www.cpcwiki.eu/forum/index.php?action=profile;u=380)
@Poliander (https://www.cpcwiki.eu/forum/index.php?action=profile;u=203)
@Drtad (https://www.cpcwiki.eu/forum/index.php?action=profile;u=4401)
Quote from: XeNoMoRPH on 12:13, 14 October 21
If I understood correctly, The version to be manufactured is v9990 with the Amstrad connector, on the other side ... you will only need an MX4 board to connect it to the CPC ... there is an adapter called AMSDAP, which is used to connect MSX hardware that uses a MSX cartridge in the CPC, such as the SE-ONE or the MSX v9990.I imagine the v9990 board is similar to this previous one that was made:
Quote from: zhulien on 17:18, 18 October 21If it is needed i'll buy 1 more unit (only if needed!!)
Hi Everyone, we are only at 17, we need to make 24 orders for Tecnobytes.
That is 7 more (which could include the 4 who haven't PM'd me yet unless you are changing your mind - which you can).
Quote from: zhulien on 13:19, 21 October 21I think that the batch is going to be made... only a little more patience.
Hi Everyone,
We are at 18 people (I know a couple of you have offered to buy 2 units), mention that to Tecnobytes when you place your order.
We need another 6 people so i can place the order. Surely the ability to run Symbos with some software coming out that supports the v9990 is exciting?
Quote from: Joseman on 18:06, 21 October 21
I think that the batch is going to be made... only a little more patience.
Quote from: zhulien on 18:13, 21 October 21With the videos of Micro Machines i doubt it!!
Just afraid the longer the wait, people will start changing their minds :D
Quote from: Joseman on 18:21, 21 October 21It is just a tilemap displayed from the VDP memory that scroll by moving a sprite to increment few registers. I hope that will be a game, but it is very very far to the final goal to be hyped now.
With the videos of Micro Machines i doubt it!!
Quote from: TotO on 20:30, 21 October 21Hm, why so negative about a new V9990 batch and the current developments? :(
It is just a tilemap displayed from the VDP memory that scroll by moving a sprite to increment few registers. I hope that will be a game, but it is very very far to the final goal to be hyped now.
Quote from: Prodatron on 21:54, 21 October 21Hey, it is not negative but objective. I had prefered this VDP expansion with a video signal passthrough to display all on the CPC monitor by using /YS and a multiplexer IC. I understand that is nice for SymbOS, but I don't see any interrest except that. (much more by using V99x8)
Hm, why so negative about a new V9990 batch and the current developments? :(
Quote from: TotO on 23:56, 21 October 21Yes but the idea of this thread is (probably now was) to get enough people together to order a batch of a card that exists... But that's been derailed. Seems the objective is to stop people ordering this real piece of hardware for an idea you have in your head.
This is another thing. I talked about the fact that using the V99x8 was compatible with SymbOS and offered the possibility of porting existing MSX games to the CPC. this was not directly related to the ability to display everything on the same screen, but is more relevant for the V9990.
I know all of these things, I saw this on the internet and at the Revision event with you. Just because I would like the V9990 card to be different doesn't mean my post is negative. I explain a point of view, that's all. Something that seems to be difficult to have for 5 years with all these social networks that only allow you to say "like" and no longer to think differently or exchange opinions without being classified or upset people.
Quote from: Trebmint on 00:11, 22 October 21I really doubt about that, because the poll has grown after the post to explain my choice. I have no doubt that people can choose for themselves according to their desires and uses, because the V9990 is a great Yamaha VDP, close to the Mega Drive one, but for 8-bit systems.
Yes but the idea of this thread is (probably now was) to get enough people together to order a batch of a card that exists... But that's been derailed. Seems the objective is to stop people ordering this real piece of hardware for an idea you have in your head.
Quote from: gflorez on 12:12, 22 October 21Do not try to search problems where they are not. You are not on Facebook. Thank you.
Putting these discouraging "opinions" on a thread only asking for V9990 buyers seems for me that there is a second intention, may be a third intention...
Quote from: Drtad on 19:53, 17 October 21
Sending
Quote from: gflorez on 09:26, 01 November 21
You can find the "Robot demo" files here (https://www.cpcwiki.eu/forum/amstrad-cpc-hardware/using-symbos-with-the-gfx9000-(msx-grapics-card)/msg156979/#msg156979), on an old thread of this web page.
Quote from: zhulien on 09:10, 22 October 21Will this batch still be possible? What is Tecnobytes thinking? Would 20 be already enough?
Yes the poll does say that, but unfortunately only 18 people have provided me with their details to pass on. A couple of those are interested in more than 1 card. We are almost there.
Quote from: megatronuk on 14:30, 06 February 22
Just sent a PM re: the latecomer list.
Quote from: zhulien on 02:43, 08 February 22
I haven't received any PM from you yet.
Quote from: zhulien on 18:32, 19 February 22
From what I gather, there are 2 issues for future batches. First is that the components are getting forever harder for them to obtain although I am sure someone could create an fpga solution from the existing msx cores out there - if they support v9990 that is. Secondly is how many CPC users actually want one. I believe every now and then there will be a bunch of CPC users enough to justify a new batch.
Quote from: LewisCPC on 00:58, 12 May 22Still no sign of mine :(